🔗 Share this article

Avril Coleridge-Taylor always felt the pressure of her parent’s legacy. As the offspring of Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, one of the prominent British artists of the early 20th century, Avril’s identity was shrouded in the long shadows of the past.

An Inaugural Recording

Not long ago, I reflected on these legacies as I prepared to make the world premiere recording of her 1936 piano concerto. With its emotional harmonies, expressive melodies, and confident beats, this piece will offer audiences deep understanding into how she – a composer during war who entered the world in 1903 – imagined her reality as a woman of colour.

Past and Present

Yet about legacies. One needs patience to adjust, to perceive forms as they actually appear, to tell reality from distortion, and I was reluctant to address the composer’s background for some time.

I earnestly desired Avril to be her father’s daughter. In some ways, that held. The pastoral English palettes of Samuel’s influence can be observed in many of her works, including From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). Yet it suffices to look at the names of her parent’s works to understand how he identified as not only a champion of English Romanticism as well as a representative of the African diaspora.

At this point father and daughter seemed to diverge.

White America assessed the composer by the brilliance of his art instead of the colour of his skin.

Parental Heritage

During his studies at the renowned institution, Samuel – the son of a Sierra Leonean father and a white English mother – turned toward his heritage. At the time the African American poet Paul Laurence Dunbar arrived in England in that era, the aspiring artist was keen to meet him. He composed Dunbar’s African Romances into music and the subsequent year incorporated his poetry for a stage piece, Dream Lovers. Subsequently arrived the choral piece that put Samuel on the map: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Inspired by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, this composition was an worldwide sensation, notably for Black Americans who felt vicarious pride as the majority judged Samuel by the brilliance of his art instead of the colour of his skin.

Advocacy and Beliefs

Fame did not reduce his activism. During that period, he participated in the pioneering African conference in England where he met the prominent scholar this influential figure and saw a series of speeches, covering the mistreatment of African people in South Africa. He was an activist to his final days. He kept connections with early civil rights leaders like the scholar and this leader, delivered his own speeches on ending discrimination, and even engaged in dialogue on matters of race with President Theodore Roosevelt while visiting to the US capital in that year. As for his music, reminisced Du Bois, “he made his mark so notably as a composer that it cannot soon be forgotten.” He died in that year, aged 37. But what would her father have thought of his child’s choice to travel to South Africa in the 1950s?

Conflict and Policy

“Child of Celebrated Artist shows support to S African Bias,” ran a headline in the community journal Jet magazine. Apartheid “appeared to me the right policy”, Avril told Jet. When asked to explain, she qualified her remarks: she did not support with this policy “in principle” and it “could be left to work itself out, overseen by good-intentioned people of diverse ethnicities”. Were the composer more attuned to her family’s principles, or from the US under segregation, she might have thought twice about apartheid. Yet her life had sheltered her.

Identity and Naivety

“I possess a English document,” she remarked, “and the authorities did not inquire me about my background.” So, with her “light” skin (according to the magazine), she traveled among the Europeans, lifted by their praise for her renowned family member. She presented about her parent’s compositions at the University of Cape Town and directed the broadcasting ensemble in Johannesburg, including the bold final section of her composition, subtitled: “In memory of my Father.” While a skilled pianist on her own, she avoided playing as the featured artist in her work. On the contrary, she always led as the leader; and so the orchestra of the era performed under her direction.

The composer aspired, as she stated, she “might bring a shift”. But by 1954, things fell apart. When government agents learned of her mixed background, she was forced to leave the country. Her citizenship didn’t protect her, the UK representative urged her to go or be jailed. She returned to England, feeling great shame as the scale of her inexperience became clear. “This experience was a difficult one,” she expressed. Increasing her humiliation was the release in 1955 of her ill-fated Jet interview, a year after her unceremonious exit from that nation.

A Recurring Theme

While I reflected with these legacies, I perceived a recurring theme. The narrative of identifying as British until it’s challenged – that brings to mind Black soldiers who defended the British during the second world war and lived only to be refused rightful benefits. Including those from Windrush,