MAGA Voters for Zohran Mamdani and a New Progressive Alliance: Key Surprises from New York’s Election
Just 48 hours prior to the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold forecast – not just who would win citywide, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.
He released his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win although missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.
Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results
How was your election night?
I had to do that because they were adding around 200,000 votes into the tally every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of votes added later and his lead went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.
You know, there was a world where election day turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, where the opponent would have basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However the winner added 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the primary.
Expanding Support
Where did the mayor-elect get additional support from?
He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Plus he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.
He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse, youthful, renters and residents struggling with costs
Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?
It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president previously went for the progressive this year. However it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.
Turnout and Effects
A major development of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?
Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.
You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?
Right now you would say he’s favored to get over half. He has 50.4% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think certain, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it so then none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.
GOP Decline
The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.
He lost any district in any borough. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an highly conservative area. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained many conservatives on the island who had a high participation. I think there was significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened before the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.
The “Commie Corridor”
What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?
I think existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there existed some opposition. But no, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran won – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.
Jewish Voters
Prior to the election there was coverage on whether the candidate was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?
Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. And also, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if existed major surprises here, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.
Political Impact
Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?
Yes, it’s not accidental that key figures from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be more of that – candidates will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.
However I think that each urban center in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – since they’re young, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.