🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities will be slashed by more than half, after a divisive legislative amendment that required local governments to put the fate of hard-won Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include one or more elected officials depending on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the choice to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils were only able to create a Indigenous seat by first putting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities often spent years generating community backing and urging their councils to create Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to set up a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, saying local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated councils that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the referendum, 17 decided to retain their seats, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – showing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

The results represented “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the new policy as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to measures intended to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has said it wants to end “ethnic-specific” approaches, and asserts it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

The results of the public votes were divided down city-country divisions – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Māori wards, while rural regions leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent local government elections registered the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with less than a third of citizens casting a vote, prompting demands for reform.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are able to establish other types of wards – such as rural wards – without initially mandating a public vote. The disparate requirements applied to Māori wards suggested the government was targeting Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark referred to the 17 areas that voted to keep their seats.